🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising group of states are considering parallel measures.

• The Danish government has stated a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our children's childhood". A law may be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have suggested that an Australian-model ban is "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has asked parliament to approve a law increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has recommended a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Netherlands has urged parents to block their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has passed a non-binding motion calling for a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is granted. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the move does not establish mandatory rules.

"An effective age restriction is a useful first step," stated a leading parliamentarian behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a future ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "based on conclusive data".

Previously, momentum built behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing harmful online content contends that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could create a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to design tools that are safe and suitable for minors," stated a influential online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

In the United States, regulation is mostly unfolding at the state government level against a backdrop of country-wide inaction.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to one hour of social media access per day, with additional time dependent on parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring guardian approval for teenagers to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from some politicians to copy this path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Outlook

Beyond these regions, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for the platform Instagram to 16.

Yet, global agencies strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize child safeguards.

As this global debate unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to self-regulate.